The
"Project" is progressing to where it is dawning
on me that the parts I'm a ssembling
really will fly. I suppose I've known and believed that all
along but somehow it never seemed quite so "real".
Its January 2005 and the tail feathers and wings are "done"
and the fuselage has a long way to go but it seems "doable",
too. After perusing other web sites I see fellow builders
like Matthew and Mike
are starting to feel the same thing as they complete their
planes. So its time to be thinking about the panel.
Here's
the dream panel description. First, its all electric. If you
want to put a vacuum pump in your home built I won't object.
Its an unreliable expense in my opinion but electric steam
gauge replacements are not exactly cheap either. The heart
of the panel is the Grand
Rapids EFIS and EIS mounted on an Affordable
Panels panel. The radio stack consists of a Garmin GNC
300-XL GPS/COM, an SL 30 Nav/Com, a Garmin transponder (GTX-320
shown but the 327 is more likely) and an intercom (GMA 340).
The autopilot consists of Trutrak's Digitrak and their Altrak.
I added a GI 106A VOR/LOC/GS indicator for the Nav/Com a lift
reserve indicator and some back up gauges in case there was
an electrical failure and I lost the EFIS. These backups are
a turn bank indicator, VSI an altimeter and a tachometer.
As long as I was dreaming I put a two place oxygen system
in for when I decide to fly high.
So
why did I pick each of these?
The
Grand Rapids Technology EFIS and EIS appeared to give me everything
I was looking for and a lot that I didn't know I was looking
for. The unit gives Primary Flight Data (PFD), a complete
Engine Information System (EIS), and a moving map GPS for
$8,995. This unit comes with two screens and each one can
display any single data set (PFD, EIS, or GPS) or any two
data sets. The PFD page features:
Highway
In the Sky Guidance – effortless and intuitive 3-dimensional
guidance
Vertical Guidance – Never miss an assigned altitude,
or begin a descent too late.
User Defined Approach – Vertical and lateral guidance
for ILS like approaches to any airport.
Digital and graphical display of GPS data
Unlimited Pitch and Roll – no gimbal limits!
Slaved Directional Gyro – No manual input required!
Airspeed, Altitude, and Vertical Speed – No delicate
mechanical movements.
True Airspeed –
Density Altitude –
Outside Air Temperature --
Wind Speed and Direction – Continuously computed.
G-meter
Moving Map – with gyro-stabilized for smooth, no jerk
screen updates.
Altitude Encoder Output
High speed processor for smooth and seamless (no jerk) display
User-selectable and programmable screens with split screen
or full screen modes
Alarms and Redlines user settable
Instant Start-up – 15 second gyro alignment time
I
could go on about the capabilities of this unit but after
comparing it to the Dynon, which appears to be a nice and
very affordable VFR unit, and to the Blue Mountain, there
didn't seem to me to be a lot of choice based on my flying
desires.
Now
when it came to the radio stack, if I could have reasonably
avoided buying another Garmin product I would have. I've dealt
with their service department on a 195 that I own and I swear
their motto is "If you don't like our service, we'll
service you again." I rue the day UPS Avionics sold out
to Garmin. The bottom line is no one else sells anything close
and I have no choice other than go with something second rate
or something older, less advanced, etc. I'll grumble a little
every time I see the name getting into the plane and complain
bitterly when I have to deal with their service department
again...and I'll bypass the arrogant boys at the Garmin display
in Oshkosh. Nuff said.
The
GNC 300-XL GPS/Com is IFR certified en route and is only about
$100 more than the equivalent VFR GPX/Com. I wanted 2 Com
radios and a GPS unit. This gives me both for less than $3,000.
I'm not IFR rated but expect to become so after building the
RV-9A. Hence, I can easily justify the extra $100. The GPS
will also connect to GRT EFIS so I have a decent size color
moving map there. Currently the GRT moving map is pretty much
bare bones but there are plans to expand it. Its always dangerous
to count on the future availability of planned upgrades. GRT
seems to be a reliable company and if it doesn't materialize,
what is there now (airports and nav aids w/o planimetrics)
is most of what I want.
The
SL-30 provides a second Com unit plus it has Nav information
which gives the VOR/ILS/GS info and the chance to add the
$1,400+ GI 106 Nav head. I suppose I could save some money
and just use the SL-40. Well, this is my dream panel. My real
panel may have the SL-40.
The
choice of transponders is largely driven by money. I like
the GTX-327 because its solid state, light, and reasonably
affordable. The GTX-330 is mode-S capable, so that will be
one less upgrade needed when the FAA or Homeland Security
decides I need a mode S transponder. What is cool is it can
locate traffic (location, direction, altitude and climb/descent
info) and display it on the GRT moving map. I enjoyed the
GRT comment that when approach would give a traffic advisory
and he couldn't spot it he'd reply, "No visual contact
but I have it on my fish finder."
The
intercom simply rounds out the radio stack. Even though I'm
building the 9A for cross country flying, I don't know that
I'll add XM Radio or CD music capability. The feature on XM
radio that intrigues me is the ability to get DUATS NEXRAD
maps. Here's a chance to get information that's typically
5 minutes or less old and has a view that no onboard radar
can possibly give. You can truly see around storm fronts.
While some would argue that 5 minute old data is worthless
I don't necessarily agree. A lot of it depends on the risks
you're willing to take. Staying 20-30 minutes away from adverse
weather and 10-15 minutes from marginal weather seems prudent
and it makes 5 minute old weather rather adequate.
I
was rather surprised at how short the stack actually is. I
may move the radios up and put a map box in a the bottom.
Before I decide I want to see if I can make on that will actually
hold sectionals and maybe AFDs too. My first priority is a
functional panel and cockpit and if the map box is too short
for a sectional it likely won't become a reality.
The
oxygen regulator is truly part of the dream. I do plan to
use the ability of the 9A to fly high for when I plan long
distance cross country. It may not be part of the initial
build and the actual unit that goes in may not be this exact
one but in time it will happen.
About
the only other comment worth mentioning now is I plan to have
a dual electrical system so if I have an electrical problem
there will be more than enough redundancy to allow safe continuation
of the flight to either the final destination or a nearby
alternate field without having a total pucker situation.
If
you have comments or suggestions, feel free to send them to
me at don_at_propjock.com.
|